10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 8, 2012
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from | to |
Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Commission File No.: 001-34079
Delaware
|
11-3516358
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455
Rockville, MD 20850
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Telephone: (240) 268-5300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
|
o
|
Accelerated Filer
|
þ
|
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
o
|
Smaller reporting company
|
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 95,345,656 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 8, 2012.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
|
Page
|
||
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
5
|
|
4)
|
6
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2
|
35
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 3
|
43
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 4
|
43
|
||
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 1A
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 2
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 3
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 4
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 5
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item 6
|
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
45
|
PART I
|
Financial Information
|
Item 1 | Financial Statements |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
June 30, 2012
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(unaudited) | 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 8,482,981 | $ | 9,861,488 | ||||
Marketable securities (note 3)
|
100,000 | 1,950,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (note 4)
|
333,905 | 333,171 | ||||||
Note receivable – current portion (note 5)
|
4,671 | 18,682 | ||||||
Total Current Assets
|
8,921,557 | 12,163,341 | ||||||
Restricted Cash Equivalents (note 16)
|
763,891 | 1,431,765 | ||||||
Equipment, Net (note 6)
|
73,100 | 94,542 | ||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 9,758,548 | $ | 13,689,648 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (note 7)
|
$ | 890,967 | $ | 1,185,405 | ||||
Deferred Research and Development Arrangement (note 8)
|
787,500 | 825,000 | ||||||
Other Liabilities (note 9)
|
85,883 | 104,388 | ||||||
Warrant Liabilities (note 13)
|
328,338 | 868,725 | ||||||
Total Liabilities
|
2,092,688 | 2,983,518 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (note 16)
|
||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity (note 11):
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001, 100,000,000 authorized shares, none issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.0001, 500,000,000 authorized shares, 95,359,861 issued and 95,345,656 outstanding
|
9,536 | 9,536 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
67,951,543 | 67,809,617 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit during the development stage
|
(60,266,809 | ) | (57,084,613 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, 14,205 shares, at cost
|
(28,410 | ) | (28,410 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
7,665,860 | 10,706,130 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$ | 9,758,548 | $ | 13,689,648 |
See the notes accompanying the condensed financial statements.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
(Unaudited)
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||
from
March 19,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2001
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
(Inception) to
June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Research
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
742,594 | 927,617 | 1,470,766 | 2,036,790 | 28,817,761 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
1,018,256 | 5,417,094 | 2,060,956 | 8,134,622 | 33,946,559 | |||||||||||||||
Patent fees
|
77,373 | 103,225 | 179,962 | 175,739 | 2,280,967 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,721 | 10,650 | 21,442 | 24,777 | 661,979 | |||||||||||||||
Total Expenses
|
1,848,944 | 6,458,586 | 3,733,126 | 10,371,928 | 65,707,266 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from Operations
|
(1,848,944 | ) | (6,458,586 | ) | (3,733,126 | ) | (10,371,928 | ) | (65,707,266 | ) | ||||||||||
Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Realized loss on marketable securities .
|
- | (3,960 | ) | - | (3,960 | ) | (13,301 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest income
|
4,294 | 38,849 | 10,543 | 81,322 | 1,431,850 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
- | - | - | - | (301,147 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other income
|
- | - | - | - | 56,047 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on fair value of warrants
|
802,248 | 594,845 | 540,387 | 127,220 | 4,216,492 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on fair value of put feature on common stock
|
- | - | - | - | 2,315,539 | |||||||||||||||
Financing expense
|
- | - | - | (97,667 | ) | (640,023 | ) | |||||||||||||
Beneficial conversion feature
|
- | - | - | - | (1,625,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Other Income (Expense)
|
806,542 | 629,734 | 550,930 | 106,915 | 5,440,457 | |||||||||||||||
Net Loss Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
(1,042,402 | ) | (5,828,852 | ) | (3,182,196 | ) | (10,265,013 | ) | (60,266,809 | ) | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Net Loss
|
$ | (1,042,402 | ) | $ | (5,828,852 | ) | $ | (3,182,196 | ) | $ | (10,265,013 | ) | (60,266,809 | ) | ||||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
95,345,656 | 95,237,656 | 95,345,656 | 90,769,492 |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
(Unaudited)
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||
from
March 19,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2001
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
(Inception) to June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||||
Net Loss
|
$ | (1,042,402 | ) | $ | (5,828,852 | ) | $ | (3,182,196 | ) | $ | (10,265,013 | ) | $ | (60,266,809 | ) | |||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
- | 3,700 | - | 2,340 | - | |||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Loss
|
$ | (1,042,402 | ) | $ | (5,825,152 | ) | $ | (3,182,196 | ) | $ | (10,262,673 | ) | $ | (60,266,809 | ) |
See the notes accompanying the condensed financial statements.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
Cumulative
From March 19, 2001
(Inception) to
June 30,
|
|||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (3,182,196 | ) | $ | (10,265,013 | ) | $ | (60,266,809 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Beneficial conversion feature
|
- | - | 1,625,000 | |||||||||
Compensatory stock
|
- | - | 2,129,877 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
21,442 | 24,777 | 661,979 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
141,926 | 372,167 | 5,719,555 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred research and development contribution
|
(37,500 | ) | (37,500 | ) | (712,500 | ) | ||||||
Note receivable
|
14,011 | 14,011 | (4,671 | ) | ||||||||
Realized losses on marketable securities
|
- | 3,960 | 13,301 | |||||||||
Unrealized gain on fair value of warrants
|
(540,387 | ) | (127,220 | ) | (4,216,492 | ) | ||||||
Unrealized gain on fair value of put feature on common stock
|
- | - | (2,315,539 | ) | ||||||||
Financing expense
|
- | 97,667 | 640,023 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred lease incentive
|
(10,000 | ) | (10,000 | ) | (60,000 | ) | ||||||
Deferred lease expenses
|
(8,505 | ) | (224 | ) | 45,883 | |||||||
Loss on impairment of intangible assets
|
- | - | 286,132 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(734 | ) | 220,551 | (333,905 | ) | |||||||
Research tax credit receivable
|
- | 145,513 | - | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(294,438 | ) | 2,070,716 | 890,967 | ||||||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
(3,896,381 | ) | (7,490,595 | ) | (55,897,199 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
Restricted cash equivalents
|
667,874 | (2,776,008 | ) | (763,891 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of equipment
|
- | (2,154 | ) | (564,995 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of marketable securities
|
- | (8,000,000 | ) | (21,123,960 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
1,850,000 | 8,500,000 | 21,010,659 | |||||||||
Payment of licensing fees
|
- | - | (356,216 | ) | ||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities
|
2,517,874 | (2,278,162 | ) | (1,798,403 | ) | |||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock and units, net of issuance costs
|
- | 13,220,273 | 55,805,574 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
- | 18,000 | 170,082 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants
|
- | 317,961 | 3,581,337 | |||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
- | - | 5,150,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds from research contribution
|
- | - | 1,500,000 | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
- | - | (28,410 | ) | ||||||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
- | 13,556,234 | 66,178,583 | |||||||||
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(1,378,507 | ) | 3,787,477 | 8,482,981 | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents – beginning of period
|
9,861,488 | 12,340,239 | - | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents - end of period
|
$ | 8,482,981 | $ | 16,127,716 | $ | 8,482,981 |
See the notes accompanying the condensed financial statements.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows (continued)
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
Cumulative
From March 19, 2001
(Inception) to
June 30,
|
|||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 301,147 | ||||||
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants issued
|
$ | - | $ | 2,924,333 | $ | 11,054,427 | ||||||
Put feature on common stock issued
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,954,738 | ||||||
Dilutive issuances of common stock
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,639,199 | ||||||
Warrant liability extinguishment from exercise of warrants
|
$ | - | $ | 243,868 | $ | 6,180,660 | ||||||
Leasehold improvement incentive
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 100,000 | ||||||
Settlement of lawsuit
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 43,953 |
See the notes accompanying the condensed financial statements.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Operations and Organization
|
Operations
Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”, “Rexahn Pharmaceuticals”), a Delaware corporation, is a development stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative treatments for cancer, central nervous system (“CNS”) disorders, sexual dysfunction and other medical needs. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $60,266,809 at June 30, 2012 and anticipates incurring losses through the remainder of fiscal 2012 and beyond. The Company has not yet generated commercial sales revenue and has been able to fund its operating losses to date through the sale of its common stock, warrants exercisable for common stock, units, issuance of long-term debt, and proceeds from reimbursed research and development costs. Management has the capability of managing the Company’s operations within existing cash available by focusing on select research and development activities, and selecting projects in conjunction with potential financings and milestones.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the results of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. The accompanying unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (“2011 Form 10-K”). Information included in the condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in the 2011 Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically and as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become available.
Reclassification
The Company has reclassified previously reported amortization of Rexgene’s research and development arrangement, as disclosed in Note 8, “Deferred Research and Development Arrangement”, from revenue to a reduction of research and development expenses in the statement of operations. The reclassification had no effect on the Company’s balance sheets, net loss, or cash flows from operating activities.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting the Company
|
Fair Value Measurements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04 to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) which amends the disclosure requirements for fair value instruments. The new disclosures required include disclosure regarding the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs, and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. The guidance is effective for the Company for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2012.
Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income in the financial statements. Under the new guidance, a Company may no longer present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in the Statement of Stockholder’s Equity, and instead must present the components of comprehensive income either in the Statement of Operations or in a separate statement immediately following the Statement of Operations. In addition, reclassification adjustments between comprehensive income and net income must be disclosed on the financial statements. This guidance is effective for the Company for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2012.
3.
|
Marketable Securities
|
Cost and fair value of the Company’s marketable securities are as follows:
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale
|
Basis
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
Value
|
|||||||||
June 30, 2012:
|
||||||||||||
State and municipal obligations
|
$ | 100,000 | $ | - | $ | 100,000 | ||||||
December 31, 2011:
|
||||||||||||
State and municipal obligations
|
$ | 1,950,000 | $ | - | $ | 1,950,000 |
Amortized cost and fair value at June 30, 2012 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because the Company may redeem certain securities at par.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3.
|
Marketable Securities(cont’d)
|
Cost
|
Fair
|
||||||||
Maturity
|
Basis
|
Value
|
|||||||
10 years or more
|
$ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 |
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company sold $1,850,000 and $8,500,000, respectively, of securities at par and the total amount that was reclassified from accumulated comprehensive loss into net loss was $0, and $3,960, respectively.
4.
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Deposits on contracts
|
$ | 59,085 | $ | 163,317 | ||||
Other assets
|
274,820 | 169,854 | ||||||
$ | 333,905 | $ | 333,171 |
Deposits on contracts consist of deposits on research and development contracts for services that had not been incurred as of the balance sheet date. Other assets include prepaid general and administrative expenses, such as insurance and rent.
5.
|
Note Receivable
|
On June 16, 2010, Amarex, LLC (“Amarex”) executed a note payable to the Company in settlement of a contract dispute. The Company settled the case with Amarex for $100,000 less a balance owed of $43,953. The principal sum of the note was $56,047, and is included in other income in the Company’s statement of operations. Monthly payments of $2,335 began on September 1, 2010 and will continue until August 1, 2012 at which time the balance is expected to be paid in full. The note does not bear interest. Pursuant to the note, Amarex shall pay a late charge of five percent (5%) of any past due installment payments if any installment payment is not paid within 10 days of its due date. As of June 30, 2012, all payments were made as scheduled, and the balance on the note to be paid to the Company was $4,671.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
6.
|
Equipment, Net
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Furniture and fixtures
|
$ | 34,200 | $ | 34,200 | ||||
Office equipment
|
81,074 | 81,074 | ||||||
Lab and computer equipment
|
430,261 | 430,261 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
119,841 | 119,841 | ||||||
Total fixed assets
|
665,376 | 665,376 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
(592,276 | ) | (570,834 | ) | ||||
Net carrying amount
|
$ | 73,100 | $ | 94,542 |
Depreciation expense was $10,721 and $10,650 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $21,442, and $24,777 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
7.
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Trade payables
|
$ | 147,208 | $ | 555,613 | ||||
Accrued expenses
|
29,490 | 50,401 | ||||||
Accrued research and development contract costs
|
612,358 | 449,775 | ||||||
Payroll liabilities
|
101,911 | 129,616 | ||||||
$ | 890,967 | $ | 1,185,405 |
8.
|
Deferred Research and Development Arrangement
|
In 2003, the Company entered into a collaborative research agreement with Rexgene Biotech Co., Ltd. (“Rexgene”), a shareholder. Rexgene is engaged in the development of pharmaceutical products in Asia and has agreed to assist the Company with the research, development and clinical trials necessary for registration of the Company’s drug candidate, Archexin, in Asia. This agreement provides Rexgene with exclusive rights to license, sublicense, make, have made, use, sell and import Archexin in Asia. In accordance with the agreement, Rexgene paid the Company a one-time fee of $1,500,000 in 2003. The agreement terminates at the later of 20 years or the term of the patent. The amortization reduces research and development expenses for the periods presented.
The Company is using 20 years as its basis for recognition and accordingly $18,750 and $37,500 reduced research and development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The remaining $787,500 and $825,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, is reflected as deferred research and development arrangement on the balance sheet. The contribution is being used in the cooperative funding of the costs of development of Archexin. Royalties of 3% of net sales of licensed products will become payable to the Company on a quarterly basis once commercial sales of Archexin begin in Asia. The product is still under development and commercial sales in Asia are not expected to begin until at least 2013. Under the terms of the agreement, Rexgene does not receive royalties on Company net sales outside of Asia.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
9.
|
Other Liabilities
|
Deferred Lease Incentive
On June 29, 2009, the Company entered into a five year office lease agreement as disclosed in Note 16. The lessor agreed to grant a leasehold improvement allowance of $100,000 to the Company to be used for the construction cost of improvements to the leased property, which included architectural and engineering fees, government agency plan check, permit and other fees, sales and use taxes, testing and inspection costs, and telephone and data cabling and wiring in the premises. The Company accounts for the benefit of the leasehold improvement allowance as a reduction of rental expense over the five-year term of the office lease.
The following table sets forth the deferred lease incentive:
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Deferred lease incentive
|
$ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Less accumulated amortization
|
(60,000 | ) | (50,000 | ) | ||||
Balance
|
$ | 40,000 | $ | 50,000 |
Deferred Office Lease Expense
The office lease agreement, disclosed above, requires an initial annual base rent with annual increases over the next five years. The Company recognizes rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, which resulted in a deferred rent liability of $45,883 and $54,388 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
10.
|
Net Loss per Common Share
|
Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and excluding any potential dilution. Diluted loss per common share is also computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, but also reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that would then share in earnings, and such calculation excludes common shares in treasury. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were stock options and warrants to acquire 16,517,937 and 16,322,937 shares of our common stock, respectively, which are the potentially dilutive securities of the Company.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock
|
The following transactions occurred from March 19, 2001 (inception) to June 30, 2012:
a)
|
On May 10, 2001, the Company issued 3,600,000 shares of common stock to the Company’s founders for cash of $1.
|
b)
|
On August 10, 2001, the Company issued:
|
i)
|
1,208,332 shares of common stock to the directors of the Company for cash of $1,450,000.
|
ii)
|
958,334 shares of common stock to Rexgene for cash of $550,000.
|
iii)
|
360,000 shares of common stock in a private placement to individual investors for cash of $1,080,000.
|
These share purchases were negotiated by the parties at various dates prior to the August 10, 2001 share issuance date.
c)
|
On October 10, 2001, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock to Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corp. (“CKD”) for cash of $479,991 and 400,000 shares of common stock to an individual investor for cash of $479,991.
|
d)
|
On October 10, 2001, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock to CKD for cash of $479,985.
|
e)
|
Since inception, the Company’s founders have transferred 800,000 shares of the common stock described in a) to officers and directors of the Company.
|
f)
|
In July 2003, the stockholders described in b) (iii) and e) transferred an aggregate of 1,268,332 shares of common stock to a voting trust. The trust allows for the unified voting of the stock by the trustees.
|
The appointed trustees are senior management of the Company who, together with their existing shares, control a majority of the voting power of the Company.
g)
|
On August 20, 2003, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to KT&G Corporation for cash consideration of $2,000,000.
|
h)
|
On October 29, 2004, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of common stock for cash of $1,800 and the Company issued an aggregate of 1,500 shares.
|
i)
|
Pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger which occurred on May 13, 2005, (i) each share of the issued and outstanding common stock of Rexahn, Corp (“Rexahn”) (other than dissenting shares) was converted into the right to receive five shares of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals common stock; (ii) each issued, outstanding and unexercised option to purchase a share of Rexahn common stock was converted into an option to purchase five shares of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals’ common stock and (iii) the par value of Rexahn’s common stock was adjusted to reflect the par value of Corporate Road Show Com Inc. (“CRS”) common stock. In the acquisition merger, 289,780,000 CRS pre-reverse stock split shares were converted into 2,897,802 post-reverse stock split Rexahn Pharmaceuticals shares, and an additional 500,000 post-reverse stock split Rexahn Pharmaceuticals shares were issued to a former executive of CRS. All shares and earnings per share information have been retroactively restated in these financial statements.
|
j)
|
On August 8, 2005, the Company issued, in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, 4,175,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per share.
|
k)
|
On October 3, 2005, the Company issued 7,000 shares of common stock for $21,877 and $7,500 cash in exchange for legal services from W. Rosenstadt and Steve Sanders.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
l)
|
On December 2, 2005, the holders of a convertible note that was issued on August 8, 2005 and, represented $1,300,000 aggregate principal amount, exercised their option to convert the entire principal amount of the note into the Company’s common stock. Based on a $2.00 per share conversion price, the holders received an aggregate of 650,000 shares.
|
m)
|
On December 27, 2005, option holders exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $9,600 and the Company issued an aggregate of 40,000 shares.
|
n)
|
On February 22, 2006, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $1,200 and the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000 shares.
|
o)
|
On April 12, 2006, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $3,409 and the Company issued an aggregate of 14,205 shares. On the same date, the Company agreed to repurchase common stock from the option holder based on the then market price for treasury in exchange for the aggregate purchase price of $28,410 in cash.
|
p)
|
On May 13, 2006, holders of the $3,850,000 convertible notes issued on February 28, 2005, exercised their rights to convert the entire principal amount of the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on a $1.00 per share conversion price, the Company issued 3,850,000 shares of common stock in connection with the conversion.
|
q)
|
On October 9, 2006, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $2,400 and the Company issued an aggregate of 10,000 shares.
|
r)
|
On November 19, 2006, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $1,800 and the Company issued an aggregate of 7,500 shares.
|
s)
|
On December 19, 2006, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $6,000 and the Company issued an aggregate of 25,000 shares.
|
t)
|
On April 18, 2007, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $14,400 and the Company issued an aggregate of 18,000 shares.
|
u)
|
On July 23, 2007, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $12,000 and the Company issued an aggregate of 15,000 shares.
|
v)
|
On September 27, 2007, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $15,600 and the Company issued an aggregate of 19,500 shares.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
w)
|
On December 18, 2007, the Company issued 4,857,159 units at a price $1.40 per share for total gross proceeds of $6,800,023. Investors also were issued one warrant for every five shares purchased. One warrant will entitle the holder to purchase an additional share of common stock at a purchase price of $1.80 at any time over a period of three years from the date of the closing. The Company has recorded the warrants as liabilities at fair value as disclosed in Note 13. Private placement closing costs of $139,675 were recorded as a reduction of the issuance proceeds. Private placements costs also consist of 107,144 warrants, valued at $138,326, and were recorded as a financing expense. The Company extended anti-dilutive protection to the investors. The anti-dilution protection provision is structured in a way that is designed to protect a holder’s position from being diluted and contains a price protection based on a mathematical calculation, and is recorded as a liability at fair value, as disclosed in Note 14. The Company revalues these liabilities each reporting period, with the unrealized gain (loss) recorded as other income (expense).
|
A summary of the allocation of the proceeds of the offering is shown below:
Gross Proceeds:
|
$ | 6,800,023 | ||
Allocated to liabilities:
|
||||
Warrant liabilities
|
1,392,476 | |||
Put feature on common stock
|
4,401,169 | |||
Total allocated to liabilities
|
5,793,645 | |||
Allocated to equity:
|
||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
|
1,144,704 | |||
Allocated to expense:
|
||||
Financing expense
|
(138,326 | ) | ||
Total allocated gross proceeds:
|
$ | 6,800,023 |
x)
|
On December 27, 2007, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $18,000 and the Company issued an aggregate of 75,000 shares.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
y)
|
On March 20, 2008, the Company issued 642,858 units consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock and one warrant for every five common shares purchased in a private placement at a price of $1.40 per unit for total gross proceeds of $900,001. One warrant will entitle the holder to purchase an additional share of common stock at a price of $1.80 at any time over a period of three years from the date of the private placement, and is recorded as a liability at fair value. The Company extended anti-dilution protection to investors, and the provision is structured in a way that is designed to protect the holder’s position from being diluted and contains a price based on a mathematical computation.
|
A summary of the allocation of the proceeds of the offering is shown below:
Gross Proceeds:
|
$ | 900,001 | ||
Allocated to liabilities:
|
||||
Warrant liabilities
|
190,917 | |||
Put feature on common stock
|
553,569 | |||
Total allocated to liabilities
|
744,486 | |||
Allocated to common stock and additional paid-in capital
|
155,515 | |||
Total allocated gross proceeds:
|
$ | 900,001 |
z)
|
On May 30, 2008, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $7,200 and the Company issued an aggregate of 30,000 shares.
|
aa)
|
On June 2, 2008, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $12,000 and the Company issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares.
|
ab)
|
On June 30, 2008, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $12,000 and the Company issued an aggregate of 10,000 shares.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
ac)
|
On June 5, 2009 the Company closed on a purchase agreement to issue 2,857,143 shares of common stock at a price of $1.05 per share to an institutional investor for total gross proceeds of $3,000,000 and incurred $289,090 of stock issuance costs. The investor was also issued:
|
|
1)
|
Series I warrants to purchase 2,222,222 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.05 per share at any time before September 3, 2009;
|
|
2)
|
Series II warrants to purchase 1,866,666 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.25 per share at any time from December 3, 2009 to June 5, 2012; and
|
|
3)
|
Series III warrants to purchase 1,555,555 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share at any time from December 3, 2009 to June 5, 2014.
|
The closing costs included 142,857 warrants valued at $122,257 and were recorded as a financing expense. All warrants issued from this purchase agreement are recorded as liabilities at fair value.
The Company incurred a derivative loss upon issuance of these warrants, as the fair value of the warrants at inception was greater than the proceeds received from the investor. The derivative loss was combined with unrealized gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2009.
A summary of the allocation of the proceeds of the offering is shown below:
Gross Proceeds:
|
$ | 3,000,000 | ||
Allocated to liabilities:
|
||||
Warrant liabilities
|
3,451,194 | |||
Allocated to equity:
|
||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
|
- | |||
Allocated to expense:
|
||||
Financing expense
|
(122,257 | ) | ||
Derivative loss at inception
|
(328,937 | ) | ||
Total allocated to expense
|
(451,194 | ) | ||
Total allocated gross proceeds:
|
$ | 3,000,000 |
ad)
|
On June 9, 2009, the Company issued 1,833,341 shares of common stock and 862,246 warrants to purchase common stock at a purchase price of $1.05 per share to existing stockholders pursuant to the anti-dilution protection provisions of the private placements transacted on December 18, 2007 and March 20, 2008. The fair value of the additional warrants issued was approximately $422,300.
|
ae)
|
On September 4, 2009, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $3,600 and the Company issued an aggregate of 15,000 shares.
|
af)
|
On September 21, 2009, the Company issued 3,102,837 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.13 per share to an institutional investor for net proceeds of $3,371,340, which includes $128,659 of stock issuance costs.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
ag)
|
On October 23, 2009, the Company closed on a purchase agreement to issue 6,072,383 shares of common stock at a price of $0.82 per share to five institutional investors for gross proceeds of $5,000,000, which includes $351,928 of stock issuance costs. The investors were also issued warrants to purchase 2,125,334 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share, exercisable on or after the date of delivery until the five-year anniversary, and were recorded as liabilities at fair value. The closing costs included 245,932 warrants valued at $101,693 and were recorded as a financing expense.
|
A summary of the allocation of the proceeds of the offering is shown below:
Gross Proceeds:
|
$ | 5,000,000 | ||
Allocated to liabilities:
|
||||
Warrant liabilities
|
1,114,627 | |||
Allocated to equity:
|
||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
|
3,987,066 | |||
Allocated to expense:
|
||||
Financing expense
|
(101,693 | ) | ||
Total allocated gross proceeds:
|
$ | 5,000,000 |
ah)
|
On October 23, 2009, the Company issued 2,018,143 shares of common stock and 569,502 warrants to purchase common stock at a purchase price of $0.82 per share to existing stockholders pursuant to anti-dilution protection provisions of the private placements transacted on December 24, 2007 and March 20, 2008. The fair value of the additional warrants issued was approximately $476,200.
|
ai)
|
On February 12, 2010, the Company entered into two consulting agreements pursuant to which the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock upon the execution of the agreements. Upon the extension of the term, 200,000 shares of common stock for each month will be issued until the termination of services.
|
The following table lists the issuances of shares by the Company under the consulting agreement:
Date of Issuance
|
Number of
Shares Issued
|
Market Value
Per Share
|
Total Market Value of Share
Issuance
|
|||||||||
February 12, 2010
|
300,000 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 366,000 | |||||||
May 24, 2010
|
200,000 | 1.40 | 280,000 | |||||||||
June 15, 2010
|
200,000 | 1.15 | 230,000 | |||||||||
August 2, 2010
|
400,000 | 1.37 | 548,000 | |||||||||
September 21, 2010
|
200,000 | 1.20 | 240,000 | |||||||||
October 21, 2010
|
200,000 | 1.16 | 232,000 | |||||||||
November 11, 2010
|
200,000 | 1.06 | 212,000 | |||||||||
Total
|
1,700,000 | $ | 2,108,000 |
The market value of these shares was recorded as an expense and is reflected in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s statement of operations. The agreements were terminated by the Company on November 11, 2010.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
aj)
|
In March 2010, warrant holders exercised their warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $1,297,001 and the Company issued an aggregate of 1,197,001 shares.
|
ak)
|
In March 2010, option holders exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $21,240 and the Company issued an aggregate of 48,000 shares.
|
al)
|
In April 2010, warrant holders exercised their warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $1,966,375 and the Company issued an aggregate of 1,595,825 shares.
|
am)
|
On April 20, 2010, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $86,000 and the Company issued an aggregate of 107,500 shares.
|
an)
|
In May 2010, warrant holders exercised 890,051 cashless warrants to obtain shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company issued an aggregate of 547,674 shares.
|
ao)
|
On June 30, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to issue 6,666,667 shares of common stock at a price of $1.50 per share to investors for gross proceeds of $10,000,000, which includes $681,773 of stock issuance costs. The investors were also issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.90 per share. The warrants became immediately exercisable on the date of delivery until the four-year anniversary of the date of issuance. These warrants were valued at $1,800,800 and recorded as warrant liabilities. The closing costs included 200,000 warrants valued at $180,080 and were recorded as a financing expense.
|
Gross Proceeds:
|
$ | 10,000,000 | ||
Allocated to liabilities:
|
||||
Warrant liabilities
|
1,980,880 | |||
Allocated to equity:
|
||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
|
8,199,200 | |||
Allocated to expense:
|
||||
Financing expense
|
(180,080 | ) | ||
Total allocated gross proceeds:
|
$ | 10,000,000 |
ap)
|
In November 2010, warrant holders exercised 936,883 cashless warrants to obtain shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company issued an aggregate of 247,491 shares.
|
aq)
|
In December 2010, warrant holders exercised 530,900 cashless warrants to obtain shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company issued an aggregate of 126,195 shares.
|
ar)
|
On January 19, 2011, the Company issued 2,334,515 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.69 per share to an institutional investor for net proceeds of $3,926,397, which includes $23,603 of stock issuance costs.
|
as)
|
On February 15, 2011, a warrant holder exercised warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $215,104 and the Company issued 209,042 shares.
|
at)
|
On February 28, 2011, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $6,000 and the Company issued 25,000 shares.
|
au)
|
On March 11, 2011, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $12,000 and the Company issued 50,000 shares.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Common Stock (cont’d)
|
av)
|
On March 28, 2011, warrant holders exercised their warrants to purchase shares of the the Company’s common stock for cash of $102,857 and the Company issued 124,917 shares.
|
aw)
|
On March 31, 2011, the Company closed on a purchase agreement to issue 8,333,333 shares of common stock at a price of $1.20 per share to five institutional investors for gross proceeds of $10,000,000, which includes $706,124 of cash stock issuance costs. The investors were also issued warrants to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share, exercisable on or after six months after the closing date until the five-year anniversary of the initial exercise date, and were recorded as liabilities at fair value. The closing costs included 208,333 warrants valued at $97,667 and were recorded as a financing expense.
|
A summary of the allocation of the proceeds of the offering is shown below:
Gross Proceeds:
|
$ | 10,000,000 | ||
Allocated to liabilities:
|
||||
Warrant liabilities
|
2,924,333 | |||
Allocated to equity:
|
||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
|
7,173,334 | |||
Allocated to expense:
|
||||
Financing expense
|
(97,667 | ) | ||
Total allocated gross proceeds:
|
$ | 10,000,000 |
ax)
|
In September 2011, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $22,040 and the Company issued 28,000 shares.
|
ay)
|
In October 2011, an option holder exercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for cash of $19,200 and the Company issued 80,000 shares.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12.
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
On August 5, 2003, the Company established a stock option plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, the Company grants stock options to key employees, directors and consultants of the Company. For all grants prior to September 12, 2005 and grants to employees of the Company after September 12, 2005, the vesting period is 30% on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 30% on the second anniversary and the remaining 40% on the third anniversary. Options expire between five and ten years from the date of grant.
For grants to non-employee consultants of the Company after September 12, 2005, the vesting period is between one to three years, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions in the individual stock option grant agreements, or 100% upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the individual stock option grant agreements. Options authorized for issuance under the Plan total 17,000,000 after giving effect to an amendment to the Plan approved at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company on June 2, 2006. At June 30, 2012, 8,478,000 shares of common stock were available for issuance.
Prior to adoption of the Plan, the Company made restricted stock grants. During 2003 all existing restricted stock grants were converted to stock options. The converted options maintained the same full vesting period as the original restricted stock grants.
Accounting for Employee Awards
The Company’s results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include share-based employee compensation expense totaling $55,317 and $154,618 respectively. The Company’s results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include share-based compensation expense totaling $115,132 and $304,864 respectively. Such amounts have been included in the statement of operations in general and administrative and research and development expenses. No income tax benefit has been recognized in the statement of operations for share-based compensation arrangements as the Company has provided for a 100% valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets.
Employee stock option compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting service period for the entire portion of the award.
Accounting for Non-Employee Awards
Stock compensation expenses related to non-employee options were $(4,565) and $15,560 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Stock compensation expenses related to non-employee options were $26,794 and $67,303, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Such amounts have been included in the statement of operations in general and administrative and research and development expenses.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12.
|
Stock-Based Compensation (cont’d)
|
Summary of Stock Compensation Expense Recognized
Total stock-based compensation recognized by the Company in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the period from inception (March 19, 2001) to June 30, 2012 is as follows:
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
Cumulative from
March 19, 2001
(Inception) to
|
||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
Statement of operations line item:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payroll
|
$ | 34,848 | $ | 132,821 | $ | 74,165 | $ | 259,023 | $ | 2,569,565 | ||||||||||
Consulting and other professional fees
|
(727 | ) | 11,529 | 22,495 | 47,178 | 809,018 | ||||||||||||||
Research and development:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payroll
|
20,469 | 21,797 | 40,967 | 45,841 | 1,013,016 | |||||||||||||||
Consulting and other professional fees
|
(3,838 | ) | 4,031 | 4,299 | 20,125 | 1,327,956 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 50,752 | $ | 170,178 | $ | 141,926 | $ | 372,167 | $ | 5,719,555 |
Summary of Stock Option Transactions
There were 170,000 stock options granted at an exercise price of $0.38 with a fair value of $47,589 and 75,000 stock options granted at an exercise price of $0.48 with a fair value of $26,835 during the six months ended June 30, 2012. There were 130,000 stock options granted at an exercise price of $1.84 and a fair value of $180,326, 100,000 stock options granted at an exercise price of $1.25 and a fair value of $91,334, and 20,000 stock options granted at an exercise price of $1.22 and a fair value of $17,915 during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company took into consideration guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 107 when reviewing and updating assumptions. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected term is based upon the simplified method as allowed under SAB 107.
The assumptions made in calculating the fair values of options are as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Black-Scholes weighted average assumptions
|
||||||||
Expected dividend yield
|
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Expected volatility
|
99-101 | % | 99-101 | % | ||||
Risk free interest rate
|
0.69-0.89 | % | 0.18-2.29 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years)
|
5 years
|
5 years
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12.
|
Stock-Based Compensation (cont’d)
|
The following table summarizes the employee and non-employee share-based transactions:
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1
|
7,646,795 | $ | 1.05 | 8,076,795 | $ | 1.01 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
245,000 | 0.41 | 250,000 | 1.55 | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | (75,000 | ) | 0.24 | |||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(50,000 | ) | 1.59 | (89,000 | ) | 1.16 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30
|
7,841,795 | $ | 1.03 | 8,162,795 | $ | 1.03 |
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Number of Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2012
|
7,841,795 | $ | 1.03 |
4.5 years
|
$ | 47,664 | |||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2012
|
7,176,795 | $ | 1.03 |
4.0 years
|
$ | 47,664 | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
7,646,795 | $ | 1.05 |
4.8 years
|
$ | 83,611 | |||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2011
|
6,911,795 | $ | 1.02 |
4.4 years
|
$ | 83,611 |
The total intrinsic value of the options exercised was $94,250 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. There were no options exercised in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, or the three months ended June 30, 2011. The weighted average fair value of the options vested was $0.93 and $0.84 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
A summary of the Company’s unvested shares as of June 30, 2012 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2012 is presented below:
2012
|
||||||||
Number of Options
|
Weighted
Average Fair
Value at Grant
Date
|
|||||||
Unvested at January 1, 2012
|
735,000 | $ | 0.92 | |||||
Granted
|
245,000 | $ | 0.30 | |||||
Vested
|
(274,000 | ) | $ | 0.93 | ||||
Cancelled
|
(41,000 | ) | $ | 1.15 | ||||
Unvested at June 30, 2012
|
665,000 | $ | 0.68 |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12.
|
Stock-Based Compensation (cont’d)
|
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there was $294,097 and $397,593 of total unrecognized compensation cost, respectively, related to all unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.6 years.
13.
|
Warrants
|
As of June 30, 2012, warrants to purchase 8,676,142 shares were outstanding, having exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $1.90 and expiration dates ranging from August 8, 2013 to September 30, 2016.
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of warrants
|
Weighted average
exercise price
|
Number of warrants
|
Weighted average
exercise price
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, January 1
|
8,676,142 | $ | 1.53 | 5,624,583 | $ | 1.48 | ||||||||||
Issued during the period
|
- | - | 3,541,666 | $ | 1.50 | |||||||||||
Exercised during the period
|
- | - | (333,959 | ) | $ | (0.95 | ) | |||||||||
Expired during the period
|
- | - | (156,148 | ) | $ | (0.82 | ) | |||||||||
Balance, June 30
|
8,676,142 | $ | 1.53 | 8,676,142 | $ | 1.53 |
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the average remaining contractual life of the outstanding warrants was 2.9 and 3.2 years, respectively
The warrants, which were issued to investors in the December 2007, March 2008, May 2009, October 2009, June 2010, and March 2011 offerings, contain a provision for net cash settlement in the event that there is a fundamental transaction (contractually defined as a merger, sale of substantially all assets, tender offer, or share exchange). If a fundamental transaction occurs in which the consideration issued consists principally of cash or stock in a non-public company, then the warrant holder has the option to receive cash, equal to the fair value of the remaining unexercised portion of the warrant. Due to this contingent redemption provision, the warrants require liability classification in accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” (“ASC 480”) and are recorded at fair value. In addition, the warrants issued in the May 2009, October 2009, June 2010 and March, 2011 offerings contain a cashless exercise provision that is exercisable only in the event that a registration statement is not effective, which provision may not be operative if an effective registration statement is not available because of an exemption under the U.S. Securities laws may not be available to issue unregistered shares. As a result, net cash settlement may be required.
ASC 820 provides requirements for disclosure of liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to the initial recognition. Fair values for warrants are determined using the Binomial Lattice (“Lattice”) valuation technique. The Lattice model provides for dynamic assumptions regarding volatility and risk-free interest rates within the total period to maturity. Accordingly, within the contractual term, the Company provided multiple date intervals over which multiple volatilities and risk free interest rates were used. These intervals allow the Lattice model to project outcomes along specific paths which consider volatilities and risk free rates that would be more likely in an early exercise scenario.
Significant assumptions are determined as follows:
|
Trading market values—published trading market values;
|
Exercise price—Stated exercise price;
|
Term—remaining contractual term of the warrant;
|
Volatility—Historical trading volatility for periods consistent with the remaining terms;
|
Risk-free rate—Yields on zero coupon government securities with remaining terms consistent with the remaining terms of the warrants.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
13.
|
Warrants (cont’d)
|
Due to the fundamental transaction provision, which could provide for early redemption of the warrants, the model also considered the probability the Company would enter into a fundamental transaction during the remaining term of the warrant. Since the Company is still in its development stage and is not yet achieving positive cash flow, management believes the probability of a fundamental transaction occurring over the term of the warrant is unlikely and therefore estimates the probability of entering into a fundamental transaction to be 5%. For valuation purposes, the Company also assumed that if such a transaction did occur, it was more likely to occur towards the end of the term of the warrants.
The warrants issued in December 2007 and March 2008 are not only subject to traditional anti-dilution protection, such as stock splits and dividends, but they are also subject to down-round anti-dilution protection. Accordingly, if the Company sells common stock or common stock indexed financial instruments below the stated exercise price, the exercise price related to these warrants will adjust to that lower amount. The Lattice model used to value the warrants with down-round anti-dilution protection provides for multiple, probability-weighted scenarios at the stated exercise price and at five additional decrements/scenarios on each valuation date in order to encompass the value of the anti-dilution provisions in the estimate of fair value of the warrants. Calculations were performed at the stated exercise price and at five additional decrements/scenarios on each valuation date. The calculations provide for multiple, probability-weighted scenarios reflecting decrements that result from declines in the market prices. Decrements are predicated on the trading market prices in decreasing ranges below the contractual exercise price. For each valuation date, multiple Binomial Lattice calculations were performed which were probability weighted by considering both the Company’s (i) historical market pricing trends, and (ii) an outlook for whether or not the Company may need to issue equity or equity-indexed instruments in the future with a price less than the current exercise price.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the warrants include management’s estimate of the probability that a fundamental transaction may occur in the future. Significant increases (decreases) in the probability of occurrence would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the warrants as of the respective balance sheet or transaction dates:
Fair Value as of:
|
||||||||||||
Warrant Issuance:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,392,476 | ||||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | - | 190,917 | |||||||||
June 5, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Series I warrants
|
- | - | 707,111 | |||||||||
Series II warrants
|
- | - | 1,315,626 | |||||||||
Series III warrants
|
18,667 | 89,756 | 1,306,200 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
1,890 | 8,893 | 122,257 | |||||||||
October 23, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
42,132 | 129,221 | 1,012,934 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
144 | 714 | 101,693 | |||||||||
June 30, 2010 financing
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
15,200 | 89,800 | 1,800,800 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
180 | 2,320 | 180,080 | |||||||||
March 31, 2011 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
249,667 | 544,000 | 2,826,666 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
458 | 4,021 | 97,667 | |||||||||
Total:
|
$ | 328,338 | $ | 868,725 | $ | 11,054,427 |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
13.
|
Warrants (cont’d)
|
The following table summarizes the number of shares indexed to the warrants as of the respective balance sheet or transaction dates:
Number of Shares indexed as of:
|
||||||||||||
Warrant Issuance
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
- | - | 1,078,579 | |||||||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | - | 128,572 | |||||||||
June 5, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Series I warrants
|
- | - | 2,222,222 | |||||||||
Series II warrants
|
- | - | 1,866,666 | |||||||||
Series III warrants
|
1,555,555 | 1,555,555 | 1,555,555 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
132,143 | 132,143 | 142,857 | |||||||||
October 23, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
1,228,333 | 1,228,333 | 2,125,334 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
18,445 | 18,445 | 245,932 | |||||||||
June 30, 2010 financing
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||
March 31, 2011 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
3,333,333 | 3,333,333 | 3,333,333 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
208,333 | 208,333 | 208,333 | |||||||||
Total:
|
8,676,142 | 8,676,142 | 15,107,383 |
The assumptions used in calculating the fair values of the warrants are as follows:
December 18, 2007 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1.75 | ||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
- | - | 143 | % | ||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
- | - | 3.27 | % | ||||||||
Equivalent volatility
|
- | - | 106 | % | ||||||||
Equivalent risk-free rate
|
- | - | 3.26 | % | ||||||||
Estimated additional shares to be issued upon dilutive event
|
- | - | 98,838 |
March 20, 2008 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 2.14 | ||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
- | - | 142 | % | ||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
- | - | 1.95 | % | ||||||||
Equivalent volatility
|
- | - | 97 | % | ||||||||
Equivalent risk-free rate
|
- | - | 1.31 | % | ||||||||
Estimated additional shares to be issued upon dilutive event
|
- | - | 7,479 |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
13.
|
Warrants (cont’d)
|
June 5, 2009 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.14 | ||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
100 | % | 98-100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
0.45 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.63-4.31 | % | ||||||
Equivalent volatility
|
67 | % | 80-81 | % | 103-117 | % | ||||||
Equivalent risk-free rate
|
0.18 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.20-1.44 | % |
October 23, 2009 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
100 | % | 98-100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
0.21-0.45 | % | 0.38 | % | 2.63-3.80 | % | ||||||
Equivalent volatility
|
66 | % | 72-81 | % | 98-99 | % | ||||||
Equivalent risk-free rate
|
0.13-0.22 | % | 0.08-0.16 | % | 0.93-1.16 | % |
June 30, 2010 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.43 | ||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
100 | % | 86-100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
0.21-0.45 | % | 0.38-0.58 | % | 1.78 | % | ||||||
Equivalent volatility
|
66 | % | 72-79 | % | 98 | % | ||||||
Equivalent risk-free rate
|
0.13-0.19 | % | 0.08-0.14 | % | 0.59 | % |
March 31, 2011 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31, 2011
|
Transaction Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.18 | ||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
100 | % | 87-100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
0.21-1.19 | % | 0.38-1.54 | % | 1.32-3.64 | % | ||||||
Equivalent volatility
|
66-75 | % | 72-90 | % | 79-96 | % | ||||||
Equivalent risk-free rate
|
0.13-0.28 | % | 0.08-0.28 | % | 0.39-1.09 | % |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
13.
|
Warrants (cont’d)
|
Changes in the fair value of the warrant liabilities, carried at fair value, as reported as “unrealized gain on fair value of warrants” in the statement of operations:
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2012
|
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2011
|
|||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | - | ||||||
June 5, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||
Series I warrants
|
- | - | ||||||
Series II warrants
|
- | - | ||||||
Series III warrants
|
85,711 | 142,800 | ||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
8,668 | 11,733 | ||||||
October 23, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
129,220 | 64,733 | ||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
1,298 | 1,467 | ||||||
June 30, 2010 financing
|
||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
92,400 | 232,200 | ||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
2,160 | 57,100 | ||||||
March 31, 2011 financing:
|
||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
478,666 | 60,666 | ||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
4,125 | 24,146 | ||||||
Total:
|
$ | 802,248 | $ | 594,845 |
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2012
|
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2011
|
Cumulative
from
March 19,
2001
(Inception) to
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 50,722 | ||||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | 92,704 | 160,063 | |||||||||
June 5, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Series I warrants
|
- | - | 707,111 | |||||||||
Series II warrants
|
- | - | (2,191,175 | ) | ||||||||
Series III warrants
|
71,089 | (48,844 | ) | 1,287,533 | ||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
7,003 | (3,780 | ) | 105,987 | ||||||||
Derivative loss at inception
|
- | - | (328,937 | ) | ||||||||
October 23, 2009 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
87,089 | (177,985 | ) | (78,438 | ) | |||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
570 | (111,187 | ) | (136,082 | ) | |||||||
June 30, 2010 financing
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
74,600 | 234,200 | 1,785,600 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
2,140 | 57,300 | 179,900 | |||||||||
March 31, 2011 financing:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants to institutional investors
|
294,333 | 60,666 | 2,576,999 | |||||||||
Warrants to placement agent
|
3,563 | 24,146 | 97,209 | |||||||||
Total:
|
$ | 540,387 | $ | 127,220 | $ | 4,216,492 |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
14.
|
Put feature on Common Stock
|
The Anti-dilution provision extended in the December 2007 and March 2008 financings is a financial instrument separate and apart from the share. It is a freestanding written put (a put on the Company’s common stock). As an enterprise value put, the contracts’ value moves inversely with the value of the underlying common stock which, under ASC 480, is not consistent with the general concepts or criterion for equity classified financial instruments. Accordingly, the written put was required to be classified as a liability under ASC 480 and recorded at fair value each reporting period, while the common stock achieved equity classification. Changes in the fair value of the anti-dilution make-whole provision are reported as “unrealized gain on fair value of put feature on common stock.”
The anti-dilution make-whole provisions associated with the common stock, were valued using a probability-weighting of put values provided by the Lattice model. Additional value would result from the put upon an increase in the exercise price or upon decrease of the trading market price in the future. Since the exercise price is based on the actual sales price of the stock issued, it is not subject to adjustment unless there is an actual dilutive event. Therefore, the mechanism for determining the value of the put was to adjust the stock price input into the Lattice model based on the Company’s estimated future stock price. A Random Walk Brownian Motion Stochastic Process (“Brownian”) technique was used to estimate the market price at several points in the future (e.g. at inception, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months) over the term of the put to determine if the stock price will be expected to decrease over the related interval of time. Brownian is a continuous stochastic process that is widely used in financing for modeling random behavior that evolves over time, and a stochastic process is a sequence of events or paths generated by probabilistic laws. At each interval, the Brownian technique was run and the simulation returned the mean stock price (the “expected stock price”).
Expected stock prices returned from the stochastic model were then input into the Lattice model to provide a put value at each of the expected prices and these values were probability weighted to determine the overall fair value of the anti-dilution make-whole provision. The term was based on the remaining term of the put (two years at inception) and the inputs for volatility and interest rate were based on projected volatility and interest rate in the future over the remaining term.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the Anti-dilution provision recorded at fair value as liabilities:
Fair Values:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31,
2011
|
Transaction
Date
|
|||||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,401,169 | ||||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | - | 553,569 | |||||||||
Total:
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,954,738 |
The following table summarizes the number of shares indexed to the Anti-dilution provision at the respective balance sheet or transaction dates:
Number of Shares indexed:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31,
2011
|
Transaction
Date
|
|||||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
- | - | 4,857,159 | |||||||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | - | 642,858 | |||||||||
Total:
|
- | - | 5,500,017 |
The following table reflects the fair values of the common stock anti-dilution make-whole provisions recorded as liabilities and significant assumptions used in the valuation:
December 18, 2007 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31,
2011
|
Transaction
Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1.75 | ||||||
Estimated future stock price
|
- | - | $ | 0.98 - $1.75 | ||||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
- | - | 143 | % | ||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
- | - | 3.14 | % |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
14.
|
Put feature on Common Stock (cont’d)
|
March 20, 2008 financing:
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31,
2011
|
Transaction
Date
|
|||||||||
Trading market prices
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 2.14 | ||||||
Estimated future stock price
|
- | - | $ | 1.36 - $2.10 | ||||||||
Estimated future volatility
|
- | - | 142 | % | ||||||||
Dividend
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Estimated future risk-free rate
|
- | - | 1.85 | % |
Since the Anti-dilution provisions expired on December 18, 2009 and March 20, 2010, there is no liability as of June 30, 2012, or no changes in the fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Changes in the fair value of the Anti-dilution provision, carried at fair value, as reported as “unrealized gain on fair value of put feature on common stock” in the statement of operations:
Three and Six
Months Ended
June 30, 2012
|
Three and Six
Months Ended
June 30, 2011
|
Cumulativ
from March 19,
2001
(Inception) to
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||
December 18, 2007 financing
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,148,418 | ||||||
March 20, 2008 financing
|
- | - | 167,121 | |||||||||
Total:
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,315,539 |
15.
|
Income Taxes
|
No provision for Federal and State income taxes was required for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 due to the Company’s operating losses and increased deferred tax asset valuation allowance. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company has unused net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $58,970,000 and $55,394,000 which expire at various dates through 2032. Some of this amount may be subject to annual limitations under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code related to “changes in ownership.”
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the deferred tax assets related to the aforementioned carry-forwards have been fully offset by valuation allowances, since significant utilization of such amounts is not presently expected in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets and valuation allowances consist of:
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
|
$ | 22,998,300 | $ | 21,603,700 | ||||
Stock Option Expense
|
1,809,000 | 1,753,400 | ||||||
Book tax differences on assets and liabilities
|
376,000 | 348,600 | ||||||
Valuation Allowance
|
(25,183,300 | ) | (23,705,700 | ) | ||||
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
$ | - | $ | - |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
15.
|
Income Taxes (cont’d)
|
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal and Maryland state jurisdictions. Tax years for fiscal 2008 through 2011 are open and potentially subject to examination by the Federal and Maryland state taxing authorities.
16.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
a)
|
The Company has contracted with various vendors to provide research and development services. The terms of these agreements usually require an initial fee and monthly or periodic payments over the term of the agreement, ranging from 2 months to 36 months. The costs to be incurred are estimated and are subject to revision. As of June 30, 2012, the total estimated cost to be incurred under these agreements was approximately $19,955,856 and the Company had made payments totaling $16,818,005 under the terms of the agreements. All of these agreements may be terminated by either party upon appropriate notice as stipulated in the respective agreements.
|
b)
|
The Company and three of its key executives entered into employment agreements. Each of these agreements was renewed on August 10, 2009 and expires on August 10, 2012. The agreements result in annual commitments for each key executive of $350,000, $250,000 and $200,000, respectively. The employment agreements were amended on September 9, 2010 and will expire on September 9, 2013.
|
c)
|
On June 22, 2009, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (“KRICT”) to acquire the rights to all intellectual properties related to Quinoxaline-Piperazine derivatives that were synthesized under a Joint Research Agreement. The initial license fee was $100,000, all of which was paid as of December 31, 2009. The agreement with KRICT calls for a one-time milestone payment of $1,000,000 within 30 days after the first achievement of marketing approval of the first commercial product arising out of or in connection with the use of KRICT’s intellectual properties. As of June 30, 2012, the milestone has not occurred.
|
d)
|
On June 29, 2009, the Company signed a five year commercial lease agreement for 5,466 square feet of office space in Rockville, Maryland commencing on June 29, 2009. The lease agreement requires annual base rent with increases over the next five years. Under the lease agreement, the Company pays its allocable portion of real estate taxes and common area operating charges. Rent paid under the Company’s lease during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $39,219 and $35,078, respectively, and rent paid under the lease for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $78,437 and $70,156, respectively.
|
Future rental payments over the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
2012
|
80,398 | |||
2013
|
162,805 | |||
2014
|
82,408 | |||
Total
|
$ | 325,611 |
In connection with the lease agreement, the Company issued a letter of credit of $100,000 in favor of the lessor. The Company has restricted cash equivalents of the same amount for the letter of credit. On August 2, 2010, and July 1, 2011 the letter of credit was amended and reduced to $50,000 and $37,500, respectively.
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
16.
|
Commitments and Contingencies (cont’d)
|
e)
|
On September 21, 2009, the Company closed on a securities purchase agreement with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (“Teva”), under which Teva purchased 3,102,837 shares of our common stock for $3.5 million. Contemporaneous with the execution and delivery of this agreement, the parties executed a research and exclusive license option agreement (“RELO”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to use $2,000,000 from the gross proceeds of the issuance and sale of shares to Teva to fund a research and development program for the pre-clinical development of RX-3117. On January 19, 2011, the Company entered into a second amendment to the securities purchase agreement (the “Second Amendment”) in which Teva purchased 2,334,515 shares of the common stock of the Company for gross proceeds of $3,950,000, which the Company agreed to use for the further preclinical development of RX-3117. Currently, the Company has proceeds remaining of $726,391 and has included this amount in restricted cash equivalents. The Company will be eligible to receive royalties on net sales of RX-3117 worldwide.
|
f)
|
The Company has a 401(k) plan established for its employees. The Company elected to match 100% of the first 3% of the employee’s compensation plus 50% of an additional 2% of the employee’s deferral. Expense related to this matching contribution aggregated $17,873 and $16,846 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and $36,337 and $32,974 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
g)
|
On June 28, 2010 and June 22, 2011, the Company signed a one year renewal to use lab space commencing on July 1, 2010. The lease requires monthly rental payments of $4,554. Rent paid under the Company’s lease during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $13,662 and $27,324, respectively. On May 30, 2012, the Company extended the agreement for another year with monthly rental payments of $4,554.
|
h)
|
On August 31, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for advisory services pertaining to the securing of grants or other funding sources for the Company. Per the terms of the agreement, the consultant will be compensated in shares of restricted common stock calculated by a formula of the funding received by the Company. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has not received funding or issued stock resulting from this agreement.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
17.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not adjusted for transaction costs. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The three levels are described below:
Level 1 Inputs
|
— |
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that is accessible by the Company;
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
— |
Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
— |
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability including significant assumptions of the Company and other market participants.
|
The following tables present assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value.
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Restricted Cash equivalents
|
$ | 763,891 | $ | 726,391 | $ | 37,500 | $ | - | ||||||||
Marketable Securities
|
100,000 | 100,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total Assets:
|
$ | 863,891 | $ | 826,391 | $ | 37,500 | $ | - | ||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Warrant Liabilities
|
$ | 328,338 | - | - | $ | 328,338 |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Restricted Cash equivalents
|
$ | 1,431,765 | $ | 1,394,265 | $ | 37,500 | $ | - | ||||||||
Marketable Securities
|
1,950,000 | 1,950,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total Assets:
|
$ | 3,381,765 | 3,344,265 | $ | 37,500 | $ | - | |||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Warrant Liabilities
|
$ | 868,725 | - | - | $ | 868,725 |
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
17.
|
Fair Value Measurements (cont’d)
|
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s restricted cash equivalents are comprised of the following:
|
a)
|
Money market funds valued at the net asset value of shares held by the Company and is classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy;
|
|
b)
|
Certificate of deposit valued based upon the underlying terms of a letter of credit, as disclosed in Note 16, and classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
Marketable securities consist of state authority and municipal security fund bonds which are valued at fair value and classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value methodology for the warrant liabilities is disclosed in Note 13.
The carrying amounts reported in the financial statements for cash and cash equivalents (Level 1), note receivable (Level 2), prepaid expenses, and other current assets and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short term maturity of these financial instruments.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 in the fair value of the liabilities classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
Warrant Liabilities
|
Total Level 3 Liabilities
|
|||||||
Balance at January 1, 2012
|
$ | 868,725 | $ | 868,725 | ||||
Additions
|
- | - | ||||||
Unrealized gains, net
|
(540,387 | ) | (540,387 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gains on expiration
|
- | - | ||||||
Transfers out of level 3
|
- | - | ||||||
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
$ | 328,338 | $ | 328,338 |
Warrant Liabilities
|
Total Level 3 Liabilities
|
|||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
$ | 2,966,710 | $ | 2,966,710 | ||||
Additions
|
2,924,333 | 2,924,333 | ||||||
Unrealized gains, net
|
(88,651 | ) | (88,651 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gains on expiration
|
(38,569 | ) | (38,569 | ) | ||||
Transfers out of level 3
|
(243,868 | ) | (243,868 | ) | ||||
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
$ | 5,519,955 | $ | 5,519,955 |
Additions consist of the fair value of warrant liabilities upon issuance. Transfers out of Level 3 for warrant liabilities consist of warrant exercises. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstance that caused the transfer. There were no significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
OVERVIEW
Our efforts and resources have been focused primarily on acquiring and developing our pharmaceutical technologies, raising capital and recruiting personnel. We are a development stage company and have no product sales to date and we will not generate any product sales until we receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or equivalent foreign regulatory bodies to begin selling our pharmaceutical candidates. Our major sources of working capital have been proceeds from various private financings, primarily private sales of common stock and debt securities, and collaboration agreements with our strategic investors.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed financial statements and notes thereto set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. This Quarterly Report contains statements accompanied by such phrases as “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “intend” and other similar expressions, that are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We caution that forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations, and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. Actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements.
The following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in such forward-looking statements:
|
·
|
our lack of profitability and the need for additional capital to operate our business;
|
|
·
|
our ability to obtain the necessary U.S. and worldwide regulatory approvals for our drug candidates;
|
|
·
|
successful and timely completion of clinical trials for our drug candidates;
|
|
·
|
demand for and market acceptance of our drug candidates;
|
|
·
|
the availability of qualified third-party researchers and manufacturers for our drug development programs;
|
|
·
|
our ability to develop and obtain protection of our intellectual property; and
|
|
·
|
Other risks and uncertainties, including those detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
|
These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The safe harbors for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 are unavailable to issuers of “penny stock.” Our shares may be considered a penny stock and, as a result, the safe harbors may not be available to us.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and requires our management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our accounting policies are in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and their basis of application is consistent with that of the previous year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically and as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become available.
Reclassification
The Company has reclassified previously reported amortization of Rexgene Biotech research and development arrangement disclosed in Note 8 in the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements, from revenue to a reduction of research and development expenses (“R&D expenses”) in the accompanying statements of operations. The reclassification had no effect on the Company’s balance sheets, net loss, or cash flows from operating activities.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04 to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) which amends the disclosure requirements for fair value instruments. The new disclosures required include disclosure regarding the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs, and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. The guidance is effective for the Company for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2012.
In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which for presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income in the financial statements. Under the new guidance, a Company may no longer present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in the Statement of Stockholder’s Equity, and instead must present the components of comprehensive income either in the Statement of Operations or in a separate statement immediately following the Statement of Operations. In addition, reclassification adjustments between comprehensive income and net income must be disclosed on the financial statements. This guidance is effective for the Company for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2012.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Total Revenues
The Company had no revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel and stock option compensation expenses for executive, finance and other administrative personnel, recruitment expenses, professional fees and other corporate expenses, including business development, investor relations and general legal activities.
General and administrative expenses decreased $185,023, or 20.0%, to $742,594 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $927,617 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease is attributed primarily to stock option compensation. There were a large number of options that fully vested in 2011, which were incurring expenses in 2011 but not in 2012. In addition, we reduced professional fees and investor relations activities for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. General and administrative expenses decreased $566,024, or 27.8%, to $1,470,766 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $2,036,790 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease is primarily attributed to reduced stock option compensation, as described above, and legal and professional fees for the restatement of the 2009 financial data incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2011, but was not applicable in the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, fees paid to consultants and outside service providers for laboratory development and other expenses relating to the design, development, testing, and enhancement of our drug candidates. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred. See the discussion under “Research and Development Projects” below for additional information about expected future research and development expenses.
Research and development expenses decreased $4,398,838 or 81.2%, to $1,018,256 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $5,417,094 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The large decrease in research and development expenses is attributable to the Serdaxin Phase IIb trial, which was being conducted in 2011, but not in 2012. Research and development expenses decreased $6,073,666 or 74.7%, to $2,060,956 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $8,134,622 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The significant decrease was primarily attributable to the termination of the Serdaxin Phase IIb clinical trial described above.
Patent Fees
Our patent fees decreased $25,852, or 25.0%, to $77,373 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $103,225 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease is attributable to reduced patent applications during the three months ended June 30, 2012. Our patent fees increased $4,223, or 2.4%, to $179,962 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $175,739 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to increased legal costs to respond to inquiries on pending patent applications in the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $71, to $10,721 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $10,650 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $3,335, or 13.5%, to $21,442 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $24,777 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease is primarily due to assets that became fully depreciated in 2011 and did not incur depreciation in 2012.
Interest Income
Interest income decreased $34,555, or 88.9%, to $4,294 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $38,849 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Interest income decreased $70,779, or 87.0%, to $10,543 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $81,322 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in interest-bearing investments and lower interest rates on such investments.
Unrealized Gain on Fair Value of Warrants
Our warrants are recorded as liabilities at fair value, and are valued using a lattice model. Changes in the fair value of warrants are recorded as an unrealized gain or loss in our statement of operations. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, we recorded unrealized gains on the fair value of our warrants of $802,248 and $594,845, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded unrealized gains on the fair value of our warrants of $540,387 and $127,220. Estimating fair values of warrants requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the warrant with related changes to external and internal market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to the trading market price of the Company’s common stock and the resulting estimated volatility of the common stock.
Net Loss
As a result of the above, the net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1,042,402, and $3,182,196 or $0.01 and $0.03 per share, respectively, compared to a net loss of $5,828,852 and $10,265,013, or $0.06 and $0.11 per share, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
Research and Development Projects
Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, costs to acquire pharmaceutical products and product rights for development and amounts paid to contract research organizations, hospitals and laboratories for the provision of services and materials for drug development and clinical trials. Costs incurred in obtaining the license rights to technology in the research and development stage and that have no alternative future uses are expensed as incurred. Our research and development programs are related to our four clinical stage drug candidates, Archexin, Serdaxin, Zoraxel, and RX-3117, and pre-clinical stage drug candidates, RX-5902, RX-0201-Nano, RX-0047-Nano and Nano-polymer Anticancer Drugs. Each of our lead drug candidates is in various stages of completion as described below. As we expand our clinical studies, we will enter into additional development agreements. Significant additional expenditures will be required if we complete our clinical trials, start new trials, apply for regulatory approvals, continue development of our technologies, expand our operations and bring our products to market. The eventual total cost of each clinical trial is dependent on a number of uncertainties such as trial design, the length of the trial, the number of clinical sites and the number of patients. The process of obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals for new therapeutic products is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. Because the successful development of our most advanced drug candidates, Archexin, Serdaxin and Zoraxel, is uncertain, and because RX-0201-Nano, RX-0047-Nano and Nano-polymer Anticancer Drugs are in early-stage development, we are unable to estimate the costs of completing our research and development programs, the timing of bringing such programs to market and, therefore, when material cash inflows could commence from the sale of these drug candidates. If these projects are not completed as planned, or the findings are not positive, our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected and if we are unable to obtain additional financing to fund these projects, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.
Archexin®
Archexin is a 20 nucleotide single stranded DNA anti-sense molecule, which is a first-in-class inhibitor of the protein kinase Akt. Akt plays critical roles in cancer cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance. Archexin received "orphan drug" designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for five cancer indications (renal cell carcinoma, or RCC, glioblastoma, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer and pancreatic cancer). The FDA orphan drug program provides seven years of marketing exclusivity after approval and tax incentives for clinical research. In October 2006, we announced the conclusion of the Phase I clinical trial of Archexin, our leading oncology drug candidate. The Phase I clinical trial of Archexin, which took place at Georgetown University and the University of Alabama, was an open-label, dose-escalation study with 14 day continuous infusion in 17 patients with solid tumors. The Phase I trial was intended primarily to assess the safety and tolerability of Archexin in patients with advanced cancer. The trial results showed that the dose limiting toxicity of Archexin occurring at 315 mg/m2 dose in the form of fatigue. No other serious adverse events such as hematological toxicities were observed in this Phase I study. In the Phase I study stable disease was observed in two out of the 17 patients. Archexin is currently being studied in a Phase II clinical trial for the treatment of pancreatic cancer with enrollment completed in September, 2011, with results anticipated in the third quarter of 2012. The Archexin Phase IIa trial is a single-arm, open-label study and is being conducted globally in the United States and India. Archexin will be administered in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer to assess safety and preliminary efficacy, maximum tolerated dose, and overall survival. We own one issued U.S. patent for Archexin.
The costs incurred for the Phase I clinical trial was approximately $1,500,000. As of June 30, 2012, we have spent approximately $6,420,000 for the development of Archexin and we estimate that the Phase IIa trials for pancreatic cancer patients will be completed in third quarter of 2012 and will require approximately an additional $200,000 to complete.
We are planning a Phase II clinical trial for Archexin for the treatment of ovarian cancer, expected to begin in the second half of 2012. As of June 30, 2012, we have not incurred any costs related to the trial. We estimate the costs of this Phase II trial for Archexin would be approximately $900,000.
Serdaxin® (RX-10100)
Serdaxin is an extended release formulation of clavulanic acid, which is an ingredient present in antibiotics approved by the FDA. We developed Serdaxin for the treatment of depression and neurodegenerative disorders. From January to September, 2011, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared two doses of Serdaxin, 0.5 mg and 5 mg, to placebo over an 8-week treatment period for major depressive disorder (“MDD”) patients. On November 4, 2011, we released results that the study showed Serdaxin did not demonstrate efficacy compared to a placebo group as measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (“MADRS”). All groups showed an approximate 14 point improvement in the protocol defined primary endpoint of MADRS, and had a substantial number of patients who demonstrated a meaningful clinical improvement from baseline. The study showed that Serdaxin was safe and well tolerated. At this point, we have not made any determinations of Serdaxin’s future paths and have not allocated resources to the further development of Serdaxin for treatment for MDD.
Through June 30, 2012, the pre-clinical and clinical costs incurred for development of Serdaxin to date have been approximately $9,700,000. We estimate the Phase IIb trial has approximately $50,000 of remaining costs that will be paid in the third quarter of 2012.
Zoraxel™ (RX-10100)
Zoraxel is an immediate release formulation of clavulanic acid, the same active ingredient found in our product candidate Serdaxin. The Phase IIa proof of concept, completed with positive results, was a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled and dose ranging (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg) study of 39 erectile dysfunction patients (ages of 18 to 65) treated with Zoraxel. The Phase IIb study is designed to assess Zoraxel’s efficacy in approximately 150 male subjects, ages 18 to 70, with ED. The double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study will include IIEF as the primary endpoint following treatment with Zoraxel at 25 and 50 mg doses. However, given the recently reported results of the Serdaxin Phase IIb clinical trial and that Zoraxel and Serdaxin share a common ingredient, we are currently evaluating how to proceed with the Phase IIb study for Zoraxel.
Through June 30, 2012, the costs incurred for development of Zoraxel to date have been approximately $1,245,000. We currently estimate that these Phase IIb studies would require approximately $2,300,000 throughout 2012 and 2013, but we have not allocated additional resources to the development of Zoraxel at this time.
RX-3117
On September 21, 2009, we closed on a stock purchase agreement contemplated with a securities purchase agreement with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (“Teva”), for the development of our novel anti-cancer compound, RX-3117. RX-3117 is a small molecule, new chemical entity nucleoside compound that has an anti-metabolite mechanism of action, and has therapeutic potential in a broad range of cancers including colon, lung, and pancreatic cancer. The investment by TEVA is restricted to supporting the research and development program for the development of RX-3117. We will be eligible to receive royalties on net sales of RX-3117 worldwide. This compound entered into an exploratory Phase I clinical study during the first quarter of 2012. The primary objective of the study was to determine oral bioavailability of RX-3117 in humans. On August 6, 2012, we released the results that the study demonstrated the oral bioavailability of RX-3117 in humans when delivered orally to patients, and there were no adverse events reported in the study. We estimate that the costs of the exploratory Phase I clinical study were approximately $550,000.
Pre-clinical Pipeline
In July, 2012, we submitted an Investigational New Drug Application to the FDA for RX-5902. RX-5902 may enter Phase I clinical trials during the second half of 2012. RX-0201-Nano, RX-0047-Nano and RX-21101 are in a pre-clinical stage of development. Through June 30, 2012, the costs incurred for development of these compounds to date have been approximately $3,170,000. The estimated cost to complete pre-clinical toxicology and Phase I clinical trials is estimated to be approximately $1,500,000 per each compound.
The conduct of the clinical trial and toxicology studies described above are being accomplished in conjunction with third-party clinical research organizations at external locations. This business practice is typical for the pharmaceutical industry and companies like us. As a result, the risk of completion or delay of these studies is not within our direct control and a program delay may occur due to circumstances outside our control. A delay in any of these programs may not necessarily have a direct impact on our daily operations. However, to the extent that a delay results in additional cost to us, unexpected expenses may result.
We will need to raise additional money through debt and/or equity offerings in order to continue to develop our drug candidates. If we are not able to raise sufficient additional money, we will have to reduce our research and development activities. We will first reduce research and development activities associated with our preclinical compounds. To the extent necessary, we will then reduce our research and development activities related to some or all of our clinical drugs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash used in operating activities was $3,896,381 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to cash used in operating activities of $7,490,595 for the same period ended June 30, 2011. The operating cash flows during the six months ended June 30, 2012 reflect our net loss of $3,182,196 and a net decrease in cash components of working capital and non-cash charges totaling $714,185.
Cash provided by investing activities of $2,517,874 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 consisted of a decrease of restricted cash equivalents of $667,874, and $1,850,000 from sales of marketable securities. Cash used in investing activities was $2,278,162 during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
There were no cash flows from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Cash provided by financing activities of $13,556,234 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of proceeds of $317,961 from the exercise of stock warrants, $18,000 from the exercise of stock options, $3,926,397 from the issuance of common stock to Teva, net of issuance costs, and $9,293,876 from the issuance of 8,333,333 shares of common stock to institutional investors, net of issuance costs. The institutional investors were also issued warrants to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we experienced a net loss of $3,182,196. Our accumulated deficit as of June 30, 2012 was $60,266,809.
We have not yet generated commercial sales revenue and have been able to fund our operating losses to date through the sale of our common stock, convertible debt financings, interest income from investments of cash and cash equivalents and proceeds from reimbursed research and development costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we had a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $1,378,507. Total cash as of June 30, 2012 was $8,482,981 compared to $9,861,488 as of December 31, 2011. Total cash, restricted cash, and marketable securities were $9,346,872, which we believe will be sufficient to cover our cash flow requirements through June 30, 2013. Although we expect to have to pursue additional financing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure financing when needed or obtain such financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, or that any additional funding we do obtain will be sufficient to meet our needs in the long term. If we are not able to raise sufficient additional financing, we may not be able to fund the research and development.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We have contracted with various vendors to provide research and development services. The terms of these agreements usually require an initiation fee and monthly or periodic payments over the term of the agreement, ranging from two months to 36 months. The costs to be incurred are estimated and are subject to revision. As of June 30, 2012, the total contract value of these agreements was approximately $19,955,856 and we have made payments totaling $16,818,005 under the terms of the agreements as of June 30, 2012. All of these agreements may be terminated by either party upon appropriate notice as stipulated in the respective agreements.
On September 9, 2010, we and three of our key executives entered into Amended and Restated Employment Agreements. The Amended and Restated Employment Agreements replace the prior employment contracts entered into on August 10, 2009. We entered into the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements in order to provide the key executives with: (i) an automatic one year renewal upon the expiration of the initial three year term and upon each consecutive year term unless such employment with the Company is terminated earlier by the Company or the executives; (ii) an annual base salary adjustment for inflation as determined by the Consumer Price Index subject to review by the Company’s Compensation Committee; (iii) an increase in the Company provided life insurance coverage from an amount equal to two times the executive’s annual base salary to an amount equal to four times the executive’s annual base salary; and (iv) a one-time cash payment, subject to applicable withholding requirements under applicable state and federal law, in an amount equal to the executive’s increased income tax costs as a result of payments made to the executive by the Company under the change of control provisions of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement. Other than these changes, the new contracts have substantially similar terms to the executives’ prior employment agreements. The agreements result in annual commitments of $350,000, $250,000 and $200,000, respectively.
On May 21, 2009, the Company entered into a one year agreement to use lab space commencing on July 1, 2009. The Company agreed to pay monthly payments of $4,554. The agreement has been renewed annually for one-year terms, most recently commencing on July 1, 2012 with the same payment schedule.
On June 22, 2009, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (“KRICT”) to acquire the rights to all intellectual properties related to Quinoxaline-Piperazine derivatives that were synthesized under a Joint Research Agreement. The initial license fee was $100,000, all of which was paid as of June 30, 2010. The agreement with KRICT calls for a one-time milestone payment of $1,000,000 within 30 days after the first achievement of marketing approval of the first commercial product arising out of or in connection with the use of KRICT’s intellectual properties.
On September 21, 2009, we closed on the initial stock purchase transaction contemplated by the securities purchase agreement, dated June 26, 2009, as amended (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), with Teva, pursuant to which Teva purchased 3,102,837 shares of our common stock for $3.5 million. Contemporaneous with the execution and delivery of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the parties executed a research and exclusive license option agreement, dated June 26, 2009, (the “License Agreeement”), for the development of the anti-cancer compound, RX-3117. Pursuant to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Teva has the option to make an additional investment in Rexahn common stock for the purpose of supporting the research and development program for the anti-cancer compound RX-3117, and we will be eligible to receive additional development, regulatory and sales milestone payments. On January 19, 2011, we entered into a second amendment to the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment amends the Securities Purchase Agreement to change the aggregate purchase price to be paid by Teva for a second investment in Rexahn common stock, which aggregate amount shall equal the sum of (i) the estimated amount that is required to complete the research and development program for RX-3117 plus (ii) $450,000 for expenses. Pursuant to the terms of the Second Amendment, Teva purchased 2,334,515 shares of Rexahn Common stock in a private offering for $3.95 million. In addition, the Second Amendment provided for a possible third investment in Rexahn common stock by Teva in the amount of $750,000, which investment may be made by Teva, in its sole discretion, upon the satisfactory completion by Rexahn of an exploratory Phase I clinical study of the compound RX-3117.
On June 29, 2009, the Company signed a five year lease for 5,466 square feet of office space in Rockville, Maryland commencing on June 29, 2009. The lease requires annual base rents of $76,524 with increases over the next five years. Under the lease agreement, the Company pays its allocable portion of real estate taxes and common area operating charges. Rent paid under the Company’s lease agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $78,437.
In connection with the lease agreement, the Company issued a letter of credit of $100,000 in favor of the lessor. The Company has restricted cash equivalents of the same amount for the letter of credit. On August 2, 2010 and July 1, 2011, the letter of credit was reduced to $50,000 and $37,500, respectively.
CURRENT AND FUTURE FINANCING NEEDS
We have incurred negative cash flow from operations since we started our business. We have spent, and expect to continue to spend, substantial amounts in connection with implementing our business strategy, including our planned product development efforts, our clinical trials, and our research and development efforts. Total cash, including restricted cash, and marketable securities, was $9,346,872 as of June 30, 2012. Based on our current plans and our capital resources, we believe that our cash, restricted cash, and marketable securities will be sufficient to enable us to meet our minimum planned operating needs over the next twelve months which would entail focusing our resources on Phase II clinical trials of Archexin and the further development of our preclinical pipeline. Over the next twelve months, we expect to spend a minimum of approximately $0.8 million on clinical development for Phase II clinical trials of Archexin, and approximately $50,000 will be paid to close out the Serdaxin MDD Phase IIb clinical trial. These figures include our commitments described earlier under “Contractual Obligations” in Item 2 of Form 10-Q. We also expect to pay $3.2 million on the development of RX-3117 and our preclinical pipeline, $4.0 million on general corporate expenses, and approximately $220,000 on facilities rent. We will need to seek additional financing to implement and fund drug candidate development, clinical trial and research and development efforts to the maximum extent of our operating plan, including in-vivo animal and pre-clinical studies, Phase II clinical trials for new product candidates, as well as other research and development projects. If we are not able to secure additional financing, we may not be able to implement and fund the research and development.
However, the actual amount of funds we will need to operate is subject to many factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include the following:
|
·
|
the progress of our product development activities;
|
|
·
|
the number and scope of our product development programs;
|
|
·
|
the progress of our pre-clinical and clinical trial activities;
|
|
·
|
the progress of the development efforts of parties with whom we have entered into collaboration agreements;
|
|
·
|
our ability to maintain current collaboration programs and to establish new collaboration arrangements;
|
|
·
|
the costs involved in prosecuting and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and
|
|
·
|
the costs and timing of regulatory approvals.
|
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we are exposed to the following market risks:
Interest Rate Risk
We invest our cash in a variety of financial instruments. At June 30, 2012, our cash was invested primarily in short term bank deposits and municipal obligations, all of which were denominated in U.S. dollars. Due to the conservative nature of these investments, which primarily bear interest at fixed rates, we do not believe we have material exposure to interest rate risk. At June 30, 2012 we had no debt instruments on our balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to risks associated with foreign currency transactions on contracts with vendors associated outside of the United States. Accordingly changes in the value of the U.S. dollar, relative to other currencies, may have an impact on our financial statements and earnings. The number and dollar amount of contracts denominated in foreign currency is immaterial; therefore, we believe we do not have material exposure to foreign currency risk.
Item 4.
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) along with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, the CEO along with the CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. Other Information
Item 1.
|
None
Item 1A.
|
There were no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed under item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2012.
None
Item 3.
|
None
Item 4.
|
Not Applicable
Item 5.
|
None
Item 6.
|
Exhibit No
|
Description
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
101
|
The following materials from Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): i) Condensed Balance Sheet, ii) Condensed Statement of Operations, iii) Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Loss, iv) Condensed Statement of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to the Financial Statements. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Chang H. Ahn
|
Date: August 8, 2012
|
|
Chang H. Ahn
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
(principal executive officer)
|
||
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Tae Heum Jeong
|
Date: August 8, 2012
|
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
(principal financial and accounting officer)
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Dated June 30, 2012
Exhibit No
|
Description
|
Location
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
Filed herewith
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
Filed herewith
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
Filed herewith
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
Filed herewith
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
Filed herewith
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
Filed herewith
|
46